Pan Pacific Symposium Conference Proceedings


Comparison of Ionic Contamination Test Methods To Determine Their Ability To Reliably Predict Performance Risks

Authors: Phil Isaacs, Jennifer Porto, Dave Braun and Terry Munson
Company: IBM Corporation and Foresite, Inc.
Date Published: 2/6/2017   Conference: Pan Pacific Symposium


Abstract: In the Electronic Manufacturing Services Industry, one of the known failure mechanisms is caused by the presence of ionic contamination. Ionic contamination leads to electrochemical migration and dendritic growth. Through the years, there have been various methods employed to verify the ionic cleanliness of electronic components, printed circuit boards and their assemblies. The accepted industry standard test is Surface Insulation Resistance, SIR, testing. Although this is recognized as the test of merit, it can take weeks to prepare the test vehicles, run the test and analyze the results. By the time this is complete, the product has shipped. If failures are found in test, it is too late to be of practical use. The industry is looking for a test which can be run quickly and is representative of the product currently in production so that decisions, and potential corrective actions can be implemented prior to shipping product to customers.

One alternative method is Resistivity of Solvent Extract, ROSE,1 testing. This method is primarily aimed at product which has gone through a cleaning process just prior to the test. However, in printed circuit board assemblies, PCBAs, there has been a shift from water wash fluxes followed by cleaning, to a process that utilizes no-clean flux with no cleaning. If ROSE testing is used in conjunction with noclean flux, it often will lead to false fails, because no-clean fluxes are known to contain ionic residues.

Another more recent test is the Critical Cleanliness Control, C3,2 test, which is designed to test specific regions on a PCBA that may be prone to ionic contamination related failures. In this paper, a direct comparison will be made between ROSE testing, SIR testing and C3 testing. The test results will be augmented by a detailed visual inspection, Ion Chromatography, IC, testing, and other tests, as required.

Key Words: 

No-clean, Flux, Process, Fails, SIR, ROSE, C3 and IC



Members download articles for free:

Not a member yet?

What else do you get when you join SMTA? Read about all of the benefits that go along with membership.

Notice: Sharing of articles is restricted to just your immediate work group. Downloaded papers should not be stored on an external network or shared on the internet.


Back


SMTA Headquarters
6600 City West Parkway, Suite 300
Eden Prairie, MN 55344 USA

Phone +1 952.920.7682
Fax +1 952.926.1819