SMTA International Conference Proceedings

Reducing The Environmental Impact Of Cleaning Electronic Assemblies: A Case Study

Author: Steve Stach
Company: Austin American Technology
Date Published: 10/16/2011   Conference: SMTA International

Abstract: Modern factories are constantly striving to find ways to manufacture electronics in an environment where world wide demand is increasing and resource availability is diminishing. For these and other reasons “environmental citizenship” has become a stated goal of many governments and corporations. The US government has introduced many laws regulating and controlling environmental issues and more legislation is expected. Starting with ratification of the Montreal Protocol, the electronics industry began to shift away from cleaning as a standard part of the assembly process. A no-clean assembly process became the standard in the late 1990’s. In the recent decade, product performance and reliability concerns have increased the need to clean electronic packages being manufactured. Cleaning is now making a comeback. Today, the cleaning agent of choice is an aqueous-based solvent blend as opposed to vapor degreasing solvent of the 1970’s and 1980’s. Cleaning equipment is often one of the largest consumers of power, water, chemicals, and over-all floor space on electronics manufacturing lines. Chart 1: SMT Process environmental resource allocation weighted average for power, water, chemicals, drain, waste, vent, floor space, VOCs, and nitrogen consumption/generation. This shows typical aqueous cleaner, (closed loop wash, open loop rinse) can consume over 50% of environmental resources. Source: AAT SMT equipment power survey This paper focuses on cleaning with aqueous-based chemical mixtures. These aqueous-based mixtures usually have an alkaline reactive constituent commonly called a saponifier. These mixtures require heat and are used in air spray batch and inline cleaning systems. Current realities and anticipated new regulations regarding use and availability of power, water, chemicals and waste disposal need a new evaluation. These systematic changes will not happen just because industry is legislated to do so. Cooperation and compliance will happen quickly if industry can see a payback. In this case the payback comes primarily from power and water savings. This saving quickly pays for the hardware necessary to accomplish this transition. The payback time can be calculated from the developed cost model developed in this study. Anticipated production environmental challenges in the next decade will likely include; power shortages, water shortages, new regulations on waste water disposal and tighter restriction of VOC usage to name a few.

Members download articles for free:

Not a member yet?

What else do you get when you join SMTA? Read about all of the benefits that go along with membership.

Notice: Sharing of articles is restricted to just your immediate work group. Downloaded papers should not be stored on an external network or shared on the internet.


SMTA Headquarters
6600 City West Parkway, Suite 300
Eden Prairie, MN 55344 USA

Phone +1 952.920.7682
Fax +1 952.926.1819