SMTA International Conference Proceedings


RoHS – CHANGING PRODUCTS TO CONFORM TO THE NEW EUROPEAN UNION RoHS REGULATIONS

Authors: George Galyon, et al.
Company: IBM Corporation
Date Published: 10/4/2009   Conference: SMTA International


Abstract: In February 2009 the consultant for the European Union’s Directorate General responsible for the environment recommended that over 30 RoHS (Reduction of Hazardous Substances) exemptions be phased out starting in December 2009 through July 31, 2014[1]. Some exemptions were for narrow applications used in special products, but most have been widely used throughout the electronics industry. Due to the critical nature of some of these exemptions and the varying dates for their phaseout, the logistics for compliance with the new requirements will be considerably more complex than it was for the original 2006 RoHS regulations.

A strategy has been implemented within IBM to tackle the challenges associated with converting data systems, product design, and supply chains to meet the revised RoHS regulations. Considerable attention has been given to ensure that clear distinctions are made among parts/products that are compliant with differing expiration criteria. For example, a given part can be compliant to the 2006 regulation while another part may be compliant to an expiration date effective Dec 31st, 2009…and so on. Data management systems must mirror these differing part compliancies and ensure that product environmental compliancy data is current. Suppliers must be well-informed and familiar with the new EU requirements and must agree to differentiate their products in step with the new regulations. This differentiation can be accomplished by either a part number change or some other agreed to method between the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) and the Contract Manufacturer (CM) or raw material supplier. A product compliance approach will be outlined and presented here using the proposed EU RoHS exemption phase-out dates as stated in the February 2009 consultant report.

Strategies must consider product life cycles so that unnecessary changes are not made to products that will be withdrawn from the market before the exemption phase out expiry dates are effective. In some cases, it will be necessary to withdraw products from the market because the costs necessary for compliance conversion are not practical based on the remaining product lifecyle. Particular attention must be given to those situations where new compliant parts and their “usage” applications are coupled with product performance and reliability. For example, timing circuitry signal integrity is susceptible to device parasitic impedance changes which may not be evident in the device specifications but which may become evident in the “usage” application.

Finally, some 2013-2014 exemptions are not certain to be phased out and will be continued until the next exemption review period. It may not be possible or practical to eliminate these particular exemptions for a variety of reasons. For example, alternative material or part solutions are not available at all or alternative solutions are limited to prototype or beta level parts with very high reliability risks associated with implementation. Each exemption phase out approach and solution must be evaluated on its own merits.

Key words: RoHS, exemptions, environmental regulations



Members download articles for free:

Not a member yet?

What else do you get when you join SMTA? Read about all of the benefits that go along with membership.

Notice: Sharing of articles is restricted to just your immediate work group. Downloaded papers should not be stored on an external network or shared on the internet.


Back


SMTA Headquarters
6600 City West Parkway, Suite 300
Eden Prairie, MN 55344 USA

Phone +1 952.920.7682
Fax +1 952.926.1819